The reading proposes group working on projects benefits companies overally for a couple of reasons, however, the professor highly cast doubt on this idea as will be discussed below.
Firstly, the author notes groups possess wider range of skills and professions than individual forces, thus they can move quickly forward making progress. On the other hand, the lecturer criticizes this idea in a way that some members will not properly contribute and may have free-ride. Moreover, members who made more effort may not see themselves names completely contradictory to what reading denotes, they never shine and become thanked.
Secondly, decisions maybe take more time to be made in group working. Also by the dominance of one or two members with a higher level of influence, ideas may be neglected and not to be well flourished. In this way influencers negatively impact group creativity. As these points likely fail the whole project, no one take time to investigate who was blame, Whereas everyone looks the whole members as guilty of failure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... more time to be made in group working. Also by the dominance of one or two members ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 1373.03311258 64% => OK
No of words: 170.0 270.72406181 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18823529412 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65752180524 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.7 0.540411800872 130% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 419.366225166 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.610959112 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.625 7.06452816374 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102173566062 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464855427917 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330061371269 0.0662205650399 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683433965348 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00330268946691 0.0443174109184 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.