in many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages.
The reading proposes that one of the best ways to a approach certain projects is to assemble a group of people in a team. The lectures however disagrees for the following reasons.
First, the reading claims that working in a team will allow certain individuals to shine and be recognized as highly significant. the lecture however challenged this by the example of this team that they checked up after 6 months, the individual contributions were recognized as the achievement of the whole team not just the individual. Consequently, the claim about individuals being recognized is not valid.
Second, the reading believes that working as a group means more people and more resources which allows for quicker response and more creative solutions. The lecture however opposes this by highlighting the fact that it took a lot of time to decide the best for the project. For example, when some members of the team offered an idea, but influencers think it will never work they dropped it.
Third, the reading mentioned the people of voice can work better in groups. However, according to the lecture when some members warned the group that their ideas are going in the wrong direction, they were just ignored.
Finally, the reading assumes that taking a decision as a group will not hold individuals in the group accountable if it goes wrong because it was taken as a group. The lecture refutes this and states that the group individuals took the blame when the project failed. The assumption for not holding the responsibility of a wrong decision is not well founded.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...g proposes that one of the best ways to a approach certain projects is to assembl...
^
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...d be recognized as highly significant. the lecture however challenged this by the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95075757576 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70170836254 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7810576076 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.538461538 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226705569725 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08846696251 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125088023624 0.0662205650399 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149010828465 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116404555735 0.0443174109184 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.