Both the reading and the lecture are about the possibiliy of human being to live in Venus. The reading doubts it in three points while the lecture refutes each points presented in the reading.
To begin with, the reading asserts that the pressure in Venus' surface is extremly high. Spacecraft and humans can be devastated by the time they landed on the surface so it is impossible to make living. However, the lecturer says that the space station is going to be built in Venus' atmosphere instead of the athmosphere. The atmosphere is 50 km above the surface and it has same level of pressure like in the Earth.
Next, although it is true that the Venus atmosphere contains much cabon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid, oxygen and water can be obtained from that substances. The lecture expains with some chemical process there will be enough water and oxygen in Venus. So it does not have to supply the two things from the Earth.
Last, the passage mentions that the sun light cannot reach the surface. Therefore, solar power cell cannot be used to get electricity. Nevertheless, the lecturer argues that the power plants will be planned above 30 km from the surface. He mentions that the light will be sufficient since there are not only direct light but also refrected light.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81081081081 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40950152303 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558558558559 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0631913017 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.1538461538 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174203319094 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634221580375 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046370955908 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102764124307 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328377180877 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.