The lecturer disputes the author's assumptions that it is impossible to maintain human presence on Venus planet. He provides three concrete reasons to cast doubt about the author's claims.
First, according to the lecturer a spaceship cannot land on Venus because the atmospheric pressure on the it's surface is very high compared to the earth. However, the lecturer finds this idea debatable. He contends that life on Venus is possible and a spaceship needs not to land on this planet. Instead, it can float above the surface where the atmospheric pressure on this altitude is similar to earth.
Second, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that since water and oxygen are not available on this planet, life cannot exist. He points out that life on this planet can indeed exist because astronauts can need not bring oxygen and water from earth. Instead, it can be produced from Sulfur oxide and nitrogen.
Finally, the author claims that there is no enough sunshine on Venus to support life. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that because clouds above Venus are thin, light can penetrate through them. Moreover, the light reflected from the clouds can also provide power to the spaceship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...nus because the atmospheric pressure on the its surface is very high compared to the ea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 201.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04975124378 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3960789897 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0203634592 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5833333333 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109219721227 0.272083759551 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447653096165 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614250060366 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715375892563 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443755242938 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.