Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible.
The passage and the lecture discusses about the life in the planet venus. The author claims that there are three reasons for the mission to venus which has made it impossible. The lecturer casts doubts on the claims made by the writer.
Firstly, passage posits that the atmospheric pressure on the surface of venus is ninety times higher than the surface of earth which leads to crushing of the spacecraft and the humans as well. The speaker challenges this view. he explains that if it is possible to set up a floating station fifteen kilometers above the surface of venus the problem can be counteracted. Because, as the height increases the atmospheric pressure decreases.
Secondly, there is a lack of oxygen and water on venus so need a constant supply of these elements from earth which is not practical. The lecturer rebut this point too. he adds that chemical process can be initiated at the station to produce water and oxygen with the help of gases like carbon dioxide, sulfuric acid which are present on venus.
Thirdly, the author argues that there is only a small amount of sunlight entering venus that makes it difficult to charge the solar panel needed to provide electricity. The lecturer, however refutes this by mentioning that there is enough solar light around fifty kilometer above the clouds. Moreover, the clouds below also reflect sunlight which will enable the humans in the station to get enough electricity.
To conclude, these are the ways how lecturer casts doubts on the passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to venus which has made it impossible. The lecturer casts doubts on the claims mad...
^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...well. The speaker challenges this view. he explains that if it is possible to set ...
^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ove the surface of venus the problem can be counteracted. Because, as the height ...
^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...water on venus so need a constant supply of these elements from earth which is no...
^^
Line 9, column 149, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'rebuts'.
Suggestion: rebuts
...th which is not practical. The lecturer rebut this point too. he adds that chemical p...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...cal. The lecturer rebut this point too. he adds that chemical process can be initi...
^^
Line 13, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t entering venus that makes it difficult to charge the solar panel needed to prov...
^^
Line 13, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ectricity. The lecturer, however refutes this by mentioning that there is enough ...
^^
Line 13, column 267, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...here is enough solar light around fifty kilometer above the clouds. Moreover, the clouds ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03529411765 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45887043768 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556862745098 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0683206698 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7142857143 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102586076092 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298081930747 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299106961134 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0477767071766 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293885414871 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.