The methods of saving Torreya Taxifoha from distinction
The article declares that in 1950s a type of evergreen tree named Torreya Taxifoha in Florida started to die out and states three ways that experts are considering to address this decline. Nevertheless, the lecture claims that none of these ways provides a desired results and refutes each of them.
First, The passage states that reestablishing Torreya in same location in micro-climates similar to its own will help them to survive. However, The professor believes that this micro-climates are strongly affected by global warming and also the draining environment around those micro-climates. She believes that this way is unlikely to provide good results.
Furthermore, the passage states that reestablishing these trees in other locations in north will be a good chance to let them thrive. However, the lecturer claims that assisted migration have a lot of unpredictable consequences. She provides an example of Black Locus tree which had been reestablished in other environments. This plaint had been spread so quickly that had killed other plants native to that location and were more likely to be distinct.
Third, the article suggests to preserve Torreya in research centers so that they could be easily monitored, studied and protected. Nevertheless, the professor claims that these centers do not have enough capacity to preserve a large population of these trees and there will be a little diversity. She believes that the diversity in the plant's species help them to survive and in front of different disease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1950s'.
Suggestion: in the 1950s
The article declares that in 1950s a type of evergreen tree named Torreya ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests preserving'.
Suggestion: suggests preserving
...ely to be distinct. Third, the article suggests to preserve Torreya in research centers so that the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 336, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'plants'' or 'plant's'?
Suggestion: plants'; plant's
... She believes that the diversity in the plants species help them to survive and in fro...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30165289256 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9559090652 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561983471074 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0617057771 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.916666667 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0649059823796 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0217808442896 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330691616348 0.0662205650399 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0404707386313 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215177802505 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.