modified trees and natural ones
Both the passage and the lecture discuses genetic modified trees. The passage claims that genetic modification will improve trees and bring many benefits by explaining three of them. In the opposite, the professor said it is true that the modified trees have benefits but there are some problems with them.
Firstly, the reading states that these trees are more durable in hard conditions in comparison to nature ones. the professor Denis this passage's claim by saying that modified trees will be resistant in a particular condition and without any guarantee to behave similarly in other conditions, but the nature ones are resistance towards all weather conditions.
Secondly, the passages talks about economic benefits of modified trees because of their faster growing and following greater yields. Oppositely, the professor oppose to these by stating that the seed of modified trees will be hidden by climatic changes to we require more seed to plant. People must pay money to company each time of planting these tree.
Third, according to passage, modified trees prepare normal condition for prevention of overexploitation of wild trees. In these faster grow trees can use as firewood and building timber instead of those wild. The professor decline this by explanation of aggressive growth of modified trees among natural ones which cause competition among them with natural ones for soil.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...onditions in comparison to nature ones. the professor Denis this passages claim by ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, third, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33484162896 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59680415558 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597285067873 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4474666499 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.181818182 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478727738947 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170718805616 0.0996497079465 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104062937037 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287044793261 0.162205337803 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101250334376 0.0443174109184 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.