One of the more serious threats facing wildlife in North America is the future of bobwhite quails.
The passage talks about how to prevent the decline of bobwhite quail’s population. Disputing the passage’s arguments, the professor cited several pieces of evidence why the methods proposed in the passage may not be useful.
First, she states that to restore the bird’s population, we need to reserve a connected a region instead of isolated farm areas as the passage argued. Biologists have found that bobwhite quail can not survive in small areas but can only thrive in a large habitat. Specifically, we need to incorporate pre-existing farmland with region of borders to form a wider region for the species to thrive.
Second, the professor doesn’t think that banning hunting will have much effect on quail’s population since hunting is not the major cause behind the significant decline of the bird's population. Therefore, even if we ban hunting entirely, quail population will continue to decrease. Instead, restoring the bird’s nesting habitat is much more crucial.
Third, dismissing the passage’s argument that we can restore quail’s population by breeding and releasing quail artificially, the professor argues that the genetic inferiority of household quail may well make the situation worse. Since domestic quail suffer from inbreeding, they have inferior genetics as opposed to that of the natural quail. Therefore, releasing this kind of species into the wild will only decrease the genetic integrity of wild quail, thus doing more harm to the already endangered quail population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage talks about how to prevent t...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...osed in the passage may not be useful. First, she states that to restore the bi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der region for the species to thrive. Second, the professor doesn’t think that...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...e behind the significant decline of the birds population. Therefore, even if we ban h...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... nesting habitat is much more crucial. Third, dismissing the passage’s argument...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47435897436 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79931492929 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3791841038 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.454545455 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130391814398 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055628940137 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405472469798 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751610122415 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363368574412 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.