One of the more serious threats facing wildlife in North America is the future of bobwhite quails.
The passage talks about how to prevent the decline of the population of bobwhite quail. Disputing the passage’s arguments, the professor cites several pieces of evidence why the methods proposed in it may not be practical.
First, she states that to restore the population of the birds, we need to reserve a connected region instead of isolated agricultural lands, as the passage argues. Biologists have found that bobwhite quail can not survive in small areas but thrive in a vast habitat. Specifically, we need to incorporate pre-existing farmland with regional borders to form a wider region for the species to thrive.
Second, the professor takes exception to the idea that banning hunting will have much effect on the population of quail since it is not the primary factor behind the significant decline. Therefore, even if we ban hunting entirely, the quail population will continue to decrease. Instead, since bobwhite quail is a prolific species, restoring the nesting habitat is much more crucial.
Third, dismissing the passage’s argument that we can restore the population of quail by breeding and releasing quail artificially, the professor argues that the genetic inferiority of household quail may well make the situation worse. Since domestic quail suffer from inbreeding, they have inferior genetics as opposed to that of the natural quail. Therefore, releasing this kind of species into the wild will only deteriorate the genetic integrity of wild quail, thus doing more harm to the already endangered quail population. Instead, he maintains that "trap and transfer" is a much better approach. By trapping bobwhites in areas with dense populations and moving them to low-density but suitable areas, we can increase their numbers while preserving the strong genes of the wild bobwhite.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage talks about how to prevent t...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s proposed in it may not be practical. First, she states that to restore the po...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der region for the species to thrive. Second, the professor takes exception to...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... nesting habitat is much more crucial. Third, dismissing the passage’s argument...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus, well, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38947368421 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86526410319 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3226400613 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.153846154 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143601941402 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582180524237 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493387298786 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086575121228 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339921654088 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.