One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die. Some people suggest that th

The passage and lecture are arguing over the question whether the TED is an efficient way for saving the caught turtles. The author lists three reasons to state that TEDs are not efficient equipment. On the contrary, the professor challenges these reasons and she rebuts them one by one.

Firstly, as it is said on the passage, the shrimp boats may catch one turtle per month and it is should not be necessary for shrimp boats to use the TEDs. In contrast, the lecturer refuses this point and she asserts that there are thousands of shrimp boat in coast. In this respect, a large numbers of the turtle are cuaght. Moreover, the ratio of the turtles which are caught should be compared with the turtle population not shirimp boats numebers.

Second, the author mentions another effective way for saving the turtles rather than TEDs. Based on the passage, the shrimper should keep their nets only for limited time and then pull it up and save turtles if there is any turtle in net. On the other hand the professor casts doubt on the efficieny of this way. She points out that is not so esasy as the TEDs for government to control that the shrimp boats regard the time limited. In other words, the governemt are able to check TEDs as vital prart of equipment of the shrimp boat, but the goverment cannot moniter thousans shrimp boats whether they care to limited time or not.

Third, the author maintains that the TEDs are not proper and eficient for large turtle. On the other hand, the lecturer admites this point, however, she says that the TEDs producers are able to produce new TEDs. These new TEDs have more space for escaping which provide a proper opportunity for large turtles to escape from net.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...he passage and lecture are arguing over the question whether the TED is an efficient way for saving ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...s may catch one turtle per month and it is should not be necessary for shrimp boat...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, third, in contrast, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67549668874 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17028668427 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513245033113 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.8123498331 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149055731457 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551692627881 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451268910277 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895263202043 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516892613033 0.0443174109184 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 53.8541721854 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.