online encyclopedias
The reading and the lecture are both talking about online encyclopedias and the traditional printed articles. Whereas the author of the reading states that the communal online encyclopedias have some difficulties to be trusts and valued by people. In contrast, the speaker claims just right the opposite. Also, the lecturer casts doubt on these ideas that made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, the online encyclopedia usually has lack of academic materials by the contributors and sometimes inaccurate information are provided by them. However, the lecturer disputes this point by saying that errors remain for decades if the information entry process is not observed.
Secondly, the reading states that the nature of these online encyclopedia are favorable by hackers and give them opportunities to fabricate, delete and add incorrect entry unlike the traditional prints. Nevertheless, the lecture refutes this argument. She argues that these online encyclopedias can be protected by expert and trained people. In addition, she added that these experts can make format to make the entry process more protected.
Finally, the reading claims that it the traditional encyclopedia provides a considerable view of any topics with what to include and what to exclude. On the other hand, online encyclopedias have unlimited space, and they have algorithm to define what important is.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nformation entry process is not observed Secondly the reading states that the nat...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ake the entry process more protected Finally the reading claims that it the traditio...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve algorithm to define what important is
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast, talking about, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41628959276 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84108851534 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556561085973 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 221.0 21.2450331126 1040% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1197.0 110.228320801 1086% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 221.0 21.698381199 1019% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 157.0 7.06452816374 2222% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38404867642 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.38404867642 0.0996497079465 385% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241752890073 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385850018967 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 114.6 13.3589403974 858% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -169.76 53.8541721854 -315% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 91.8 11.0289183223 832% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.64 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.17 8.42419426049 228% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 61.0 10.7273730684 569% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 90.4 10.498013245 861% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 61.0 11.2008830022 545% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.