Over the past few years, a new debate has emerged over how universities should concentrate their faculty's work. Many universities have begun shifting their focus away from research and toward better teaching methods. However, a number of reasons exist which suggest that this research is essential for universities to function properly.
One of the most important considerations for any college is its ranking among other institutions. A higher ranking benefits a university by drawing in more students. Most ranking systems put an emphasis on research work done by the faculty. Without an adequate base of research and published work, it is unlikely that a university will gain high marks in university ran kings.
Another benefit of focusing on research is that more faculties are likely to gain wider recognition. “Public intellectuals” -famous professors whose work has been recognized by the public at large- do a great deal to increase a university's prestige. Public intellectuals draw in more students and attract funding for the college. Without a focus on research, it is less likely that a university will produce a public intellectual.
Besides public appearance for a university, a focus on research can also directly benefit the students that attend the university. Professors that do more research in their field tend to have a better grasp of their subject and are more informed. This results in a better education for the students learning under them.
These considerations make it clear how important it is for colleges to focus on research. Choosing to focus on research not only improves the university's standing, but also ensures that the students attending get only the very best education.
Both the reading materials and the lecture talk about the debate between universities around the importance of being research-oriented or teaching-oriented. The article proposes three reasons to supports that both the universities and students benefit from a research-focused university. On the other hand, the lecturer does not believe this and asserts that universities used to be research based, but now they are underscoreing the teaching-oriented styles.
First, she mentions that the ranking systems of unniversities used to focused on researchs and publications of universities, but nowadays, they consider the teaching style and methode more serious than past. With this explanation she rebut the first reason of the writer that reaserch is one important factor which increase the rank of universities and lead to draw mor students.
Second, the lecturer mentions that there are two types of professors. One do a research but cannot explaoin hard understanding topics to the public to attract attention of people. It is not an easy job to explain academic issues for average folks, only do good teachers could expalin those hard amterials for general public. Therefore, professors who are stronger teachers succeed to increase the universities' reputation and absorb more students and fund. She refutes the author's idea that professor who are astounding researchers are able to absorb many fund and many students.
Third, the professor mentions that the ability of doing research and teaching do not related to each other. She adds that it is not necessarily correct that good researcher could teach better then they could not educate students better. She talks about herself and her coleague to explain that. She says that her peer is a wonderful researcher but is no table to convey a lesson to student well. Then, she rejects this idea that good researcher can attract more students to the universities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...coreing the teaching-oriented styles. First, she mentions that the ranking sys...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'rebuts'.
Suggestion: rebuts
...us than past. With this explanation she rebut the first reason of the writer that rea...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rsities and lead to draw mor students. Second, the lecturer mentions that there...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... could expalin those hard amterials for general public. Therefore, professors who are stronger...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
...ronger teachers succeed to increase the universities reputation and absorb more students and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...more students and fund. She refutes the authors idea that professor who are astounding ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun fund seems to be countable; consider using: 'many funds'.
Suggestion: many funds
...tounding researchers are able to absorb many fund and many students. Third, the p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to absorb many fund and many students. Third, the professor mentions that the a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'better than'?
Suggestion: better than
...orrect that good researcher could teach better then they could not educate students better....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 198, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...that good researcher could teach better then they could not educate students better....
^^^^
Line 4, column 301, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rself and her coleague to explain that. She says that her peer is a wonderful resea...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, then, therefore, third, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34768211921 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.060399899 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4548219777 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159991507788 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556582541587 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441738664932 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10313951246 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457872249179 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.