Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor.
There is no doubt that our friends make one of the most important part of our social life. We spend a lot of of our time with our friends at work and home then it definitely has a big effect on our personality. While some people believe that a good sense of humor is very important in a friend, others, like me, think that being intelligent is a more valuable virtue in a friend. In the following essay I will elaborate on my opinion.
First of all, you can learn from an intelligent friend a lot. Almost all the time, an intelligent people have many other good character such as knowledgeable, honest, and trustable. They provide a productive rapport surrounding their relatives and help other people to improve their virtues. To put this in perspective, when I was in university, a friend of mine, who was a smart and moral pupil in our college, helped other student in each part that they need and he could. I remember that all semester before the finals he started a problem-solving session in mathematics and chemistry for all students that they need to prepare themselves for exams. Not only did he help people in lessons but also he was a very good speaker and from those conversations many of us learnt many other social skills.
Secondly, intelligent friends are excellent advisors. Based on their knowledge and analyzing power they are able to propose valuable suggestion for their funs. As friends are usually at the same age, they understand each other better than a smart guy in this context can see the world through the same window as their peers. And actually they can advise other guys better than parents or counselors most of the time. My personal example can illustrate this notion in a conspicuous way. After graduation from the college of pharmacy, I had two job opportunities to select, a retail pharmacy in my home town and a hospital pharmacist job in a city far from me. I hesitated to choose which one, after consulting with one of my sharp-minded friend who he worked in a pharmacy company, I selected the hospital job because of his practical advise about the work environment and importance of making a good network with other peers. Finally, after working several years in the hospital pharmacy I could promote as a manager position in a chain-hospital which cover multi-states in my country. Had I not applied his suggestion, I could not have be in this good job rank right now.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that an intelligent friend is a gemstone, and it is a more valuable character than sense of humor in a friend. This is because you can learn many things from a smart fun and because they are the best advisor for their peers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...part of our social life. We spend a lot of of our time with our friends at work and h...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a conspicuous way" with adverb for "conspicuous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...onal example can illustrate this notion in a conspicuous way. After graduation from the college of p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1138, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...pplied his suggestion, I could not have be in this good job rank right now. In c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2201.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67303609342 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75143180575 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496815286624 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4859908736 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.80952381 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.80952380952 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237776744971 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666751395714 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591233348865 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14303696272 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320737492453 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.