paper vs electronis devices
n this set of materials, the article and lecture both discuss electronic devices. The writer strongly postulates that using electronic devices might seem convenient than reading newspaper and other paper based materials, but they are associated with harmful effects. However, the lectuer mentions that claims made in the reading are dubious and unconvincing, and gainsays each of them.
The first and foremost, the writer begins by assering that learning through electronic devices impairs critical thinking due to the reason that news are posted by mundane individuals and there is no way to check authenticity. On the other hand, the lecturer dismisses thess points by insisting that information posted in the paper based materials are too limited to supersede them with electronic devices. To be more specific, the news in reading materials are biased and majorly influenced with the opinion of author and newspaper's company. Moreover, electronic devices provides different perspective of a news that actually improves the critical thinkings.
Furthermore, the lecturer posits there is no evidece that bright light of electromagnetic waves causes damage to the brain or other organs.In addition stiffness, headache could easily be caused by reading book too.He further explains that it is a matter of body habits, if humans take continuous breaks by stretching,light exercising, and positioning their screen rightly, they would easily overcome above mentioned problems.These claims clearly refutes the writer implication that electronic devices uses are deteriorating human's eyesight, brain activity and health.
Ultimately, the writer wraps up the arguments by contending that addiction caused by electric devices leads to destroy lingual and nsocial interaction between people. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes an issue with the claim by contending that social activity is actually enhances by these devices because people are ablke to share their feelings through internet and are able to share their thoughts with each others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: N
n this set of materials, the article and ...
^
Line 2, column 605, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...vices provides different perspective of a news that actually improves the critical thi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ses damage to the brain or other organs.In addition stiffness, headache could easi...
^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... damage to the brain or other organs.In addition stiffness, headache could easily be cau...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...ld easily be caused by reading book too.He further explains that it is a matter of...
^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , light
...ans take continuous breaks by stretching,light exercising, and positioning their scree...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
...asily overcome above mentioned problems.These claims clearly refutes the writer impli...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69180327869 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88308413799 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596721311475 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 131.219853681 49.2860985944 266% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.6 110.228320801 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 21.698381199 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117220261634 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478844775972 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398846629761 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713747229458 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243052257076 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.3589403974 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 53.8541721854 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.2367328918 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.42419426049 120% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 63.6247240618 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.