The passage and lecture are mainly about air purifiers, the author claims that purifiers have beneficial effect to protect our health, he gave three types of purifiers, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article, he says the purifiers are non effective like describe in passage. First, the writer mentions HEPA filters as a type of air purifier, he suggests that, this purifier remove allergens such as dust without producing any side effect. This point challenged by lecturer, he states, many bacteria and other dangerous particle are very small, therefore, they can penetrate folded fiber sheats of HEPA , moreover they can be growth and concentrate in, then release to the environment again and effect the air and environment negatively.
Second, the author elaborate to ozone-generating air purifiers which use ozone to remove unpleasant smells and airborne chemicals. This argument reputts by professor. He points out, ozone need to use in high concentration to be effective, and this high concentration has dangerous effect on eyes, skin and other parts of body.
Lastly, the writer give another example which is UV that use as air purifiers, UV can directly remove harmful bacteria. The lecturer in the other hand says, this type of purifier can not remove ciggaret, and other harm perfume
The passage and lectutr are mainly about air purifiers, the author claims that purifiers have bebefacial effect to orotect our health, he gave three types of purifiers, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article, he says the purifiers are non effective like discrbe in passage. First, the writer mentions HEPA filters as a type of air purifier, he suggests that, this purifier remove allergens such as dust withoutb producing any side effect. This point challenged by lecturer, he states, many bacteria and other dangerous particle are very small, therefore, they can penetrate folded fiber sheats of vHEPA , moreover they can be growth and concenterat in, then reales to the environment again and effect the air and environment negatively.
Second, the author elaborate to ozone-generatting air purifiers which use ozone to remove unpleasant smells and airborne chemicals. This argument reputts by professor. He points out, ozone need to use in high concenteration to be effective, and this high concentration has dangerous effect on eyes skin and other parts of body.
Lastly, the writer give another examplewhich is UV that use as air purifiers, UV can directly remove harmful becteria. The lecturer in the other hand says, this type of purifier can not remove cig
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-01-11 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
- The main topic in readind passage and lecture is about developing of international fund to help forest protection from deforestization The author claims benefits of tnternational fund to protect forests However the le3cturer casts doubt on claim made in a 78
- Advacement of technology now days has uttily influence on all aspect of our life whether the technology has decrease kids creation than in the past or not can be weighted in many aspects in perspective I do not concur with this statement that technology r 76
- The reading amd lecture talk about thoeries which mayb lead to extinction of some living organism in the Triassic period The author believes that this extiniction explained by three theories The lecturer cases doubts on claim which is made by author she d 60
- The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about T rex dinosaurs legs bone The lecturer believes hallow inside these fractur bones fill with materials look like blood vessels red blood cells and collagens fibers However the writer has other opin 63
- The reading passage and the lecture are both discussing possibility of replacing of gasoline by ethanol fuel The writer claims three reasons to explain why ethanol is not a good replacement to gasoline However the lecture believes ethanol is a perfect alt 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 614, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n penetrate folded fiber sheats of vHEPA , moreover they can be growth and concent...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2243902439 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83558727409 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.0616603082 49.2860985944 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.875 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421921570223 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166802484068 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.211933348367 0.0662205650399 320% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245055866999 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17947981361 0.0443174109184 405% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.