In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely to continue, with the result that the number of birds in the United States will necessarily decline. First, as human populations and settlements continue to expand, birds' natural habitats will continue to disappear. Forests, wetlands, and grasslands will give way to ever more homes, malls, and offices. As the traditional areas suitable for birds keep decreasing, so will the size of the bird populations that depend on those vanishing habitats. Second, agricultural activities must increase to keep pace with the growing human population. The growth of agriculture will also result in the further destruction of bird habitats asmore and more wilderness areas are converted to agricultural use. As a result, bird populations in rural areas will continue to decline. Third, as human settlements expand and agriculture increases, the use ofchemical pesticides will also increase. Pesticides are poisons designed to kill agricultural and home garden pests, such as insects, but inevitably, pesticides get into the water and into the food chain for birds where they can harm birds. Birds that eat the poisoned insects or drink contaminated water can die as a result, and even if pesticides do not kill birds outright, they can prevent them from reproducing successfully. Sopesticides have significantly contributed to declines in bird population, and because there will continue to be a need to control agricultural pests in the future, this decline will continue.
The article and the lecture are both about bird’s population in United States. The author of the reading feels that increase of the human population and using more and more chemical pesticides will decrease the birds population. The lecturer challengers the argument made by the author. Hethiks that above mantion two resons will not affect to the bird’s population.
First of all, the author argues that human populations and continue to expand willreduce the birds natural habitats. The article is mention that humans cut down and use wetland and grass land to build homes, malls and offices. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that aurban devolepment will not decrease the birds population. Furthermore he says this will increas the birds population such as pigens and hocks.
Secondly, the author suggests that increas of agriculture activites will further destruction of birds habitats. The article notes people use more and more areas for agreculture perpose which are birds habitats. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that now a days human use less agriculture lands then previous. Moreover he says that the new crops will produce food for birds.
Finally, the author state that increase of usig chemicals and pesticides will decrease the bird population. Moreover the article says that the birds will drink this contaminated water wich will evantually be a reson to dicline of bird population. In contarst the lecturer's position is that new pesticides are less harmfull. he notes that now they use pest resit crops as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the reading feels that increase of the human population and using more and more...
^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...e chemical pesticides will decrease the birds population. The lecturer challengers th...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...des will decrease the birds population. The lecturer challengers the argument made ...
^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...urban devolepment will not decrease the birds population. Furthermore he says this wi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...will not decrease the birds population. Furthermore he says this will increas the birds pop...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...rthermore he says this will increas the birds population such as pigens and hocks. ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re activites will further destruction of birds habitats. The article notes people...
^^
Line 9, column 265, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
... rebuts this argument. He suggests that now a days human use less agriculture lands then p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 269, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...uts this argument. He suggests that now a days human use less agriculture lands then p...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 309, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...a days human use less agriculture lands then previous. Moreover he says that the new...
^^^^
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...e less agriculture lands then previous. Moreover he says that the new crops will produce...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 109, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ides will decrease the bird population. Moreover the article says that the birds will dr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 325, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... that new pesticides are less harmfull. he notes that now they use pest resit crop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, as for, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30952380952 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63982558862 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503968253968 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8271265024 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3333333333 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184913212505 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635625601826 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466367855153 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129426463603 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264951059788 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.