Pluto should be considered a planet or not.
In the reading passage it is stated that Pluto is no longer considered a separate planet because it does not fulfill the recent criteria for classification of an astronomical object into a planet. The lecturer argues that the the new definition is not unanimously accepted and endorsed by the astronomers around the world.
For the first thing, the new classification system is not globally adopted by all astronomers. It is because of the simple fact that some of them believes any orbiting object in the solar system which is not the moon of another plant should be considered as a planet itself. This undermines the strict criteria introduced by the passage as a universal rule.
Secondly, the professor argues that the classification should be broadened to include any orbiting bodies around the sun that have enough gravitational pull. Therefore, the complexity of our solar system will be reflected by the diversity of spatial bodies that could be named as planets. This challenges the the passage that prefer to narrow down the definition of a planet.
Finally, introducing Pluto as a dwarf plant leads to a lot of confusion. School education, museum collections, and a huge pile of previously published texts should be corrected accordingly. Therefore, there is no firm agreement upon the new name, which seriously challenges the passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...into a planet. The lecturer argues that the the new definition is not unanimously accep...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...into a planet. The lecturer argues that the the new definition is not unanimously accep...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Secondly, the professor argues that the classification should be broadened to in...
^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ld be named as planets. This challenges the the passage that prefer to narrow down the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ld be named as planets. This challenges the the passage that prefer to narrow down the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20091324201 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01585642967 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543378995434 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2893483347 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.545454545 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344529354941 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986075144238 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924036323889 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183226595351 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222972248358 0.0443174109184 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.