Productivity and Rewards
Both reading and listening discuss the idea of how rewards can affect the productivity in the work.
First, according to the reading, the theory is great because people repeat the action of being productive when they are rewarded. However, the listening passage states that in general, people prefer abstract things like respect instead financial rewards.
Second, the text suggests the use of books about how gain productivity in your work by applying their concepts. In contrast, the lecturer mentions there are not studies about the positive impact between the performance and the reward system to upgrade the productivity of companies.
Third, the reading passage states that the use of external motivation sometimes is necessary to work harder. However, in the listening passage mentions the workers habitually feel a sensation of being manipulated or punish by their bosses.
To sum up, this is how the listening passage causes doubts on the point made in the reading passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | TatianaGHGH | 86 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | mnm | 63 | view |
| 2021-06-26 | monigdc | 78 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 58
- Productivity and Rewards 73
- Claim Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive Reason It is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are preserved and generated Write a response in which you discuss the ext 66
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 58
- The use of fluoride in preventative dentistry has been a great breakthrough in improving the dental health of large populations Small amounts of soluble fluoride ions are present in all water sources including oceans and also to some extent in food and be 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, third, in contrast, in general, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 1373.03311258 61% => OK
No of words: 156.0 270.72406181 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37820512821 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 4.04702891845 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64714097817 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 145.348785872 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 419.366225166 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.6444998787 49.2860985944 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.875 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234914555845 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102677348162 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122365063372 0.0662205650399 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134335898884 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13696739544 0.0443174109184 309% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.