professor are normally
The reading passage mentions that professor appearances on television has good effects on universities, public and to the professor himself. However, lecture rebut it by highlighting its negative impacts. Therefore, lecturer contrasts with the reading passage.
Firstly, reading passage claims that appearance on television enhanced professor reputation, as many people can know about him. The speaker, however, posits that their fellow professor see him as a point of entertainer and does not include him in an important meeting, conference and so on. Moreover, he will not get money to do research.
Secondly, the author argues that it will benefit to universities. Because of the professor interview , reputation will enhance in turn more application from potential students and even more donations to universities. In contrast, speaker points out that because of the show, professor will be busy on preparing for himself, rehearsing, travelling and so on. He will not available in universities which hampers on student.
Thirdly, the author claims on public benefits due to professor interview on television. He mentions that professor will give details knowledge as an expert on certain subject. However, lecturer rebut it. He mentions that professor will just give information on academic titles, background information and brief on current issues, which can even provided by the television journalist.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that professor appearances on television has good effects on universities, public...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ties. Because of the professor interview , reputation will enhance in turn more ap...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66981132075 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03274756678 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594339622642 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0983014556 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8571428571 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203131713923 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710746592394 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707299560237 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135245776958 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256277937436 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.01 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.