The article states that appearing on television shows benefits not only the professor himself but also the university and the public. It provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that it may not be really beneficial and refutes each of the authors' reasons.
First, the reading says that the professors who appear on television acquire a reputation in their academic fields from various teachers and researchers across the world. However, the professor refutes this point by explaining that the reputation that the professor gets tends to be of someone who likes to entertain people and is not a true scholar in his field. She further says that due to this the professors are not invited in conferences and academic discussions more often.
Second, the author posits that the university is also benefitted when their faculty member appears on the television. It helps to promote positive publicity. The professor opposes this point by saying that it eats up a lot in the professors' time to get ready for the show. She adds to this by saying that, students get less time with the professor and also it affects the professors' research work.
Third, the reading states that the general public also gains from television appearances as they get a chance to learn and listen to the views of the professor himself. On the contrary, the professor explains that though the professor does have knowledge but the television shows do not give entire details of his study or research work. We also know that, since no one would like to listen to compelling science theories and developments during their supper at home, the television only explains the topics of the professors' field. This is as good as listening to some news reporter, thus the general public does not gain much information and knowledge by watching the television shows.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
.... Third, the reading states that the general public also gains from television appearances ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 595, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...stening to some news reporter, thus the general public does not gain much information and know...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, really, second, so, third, thus, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04545454545 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62727144334 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516233766234 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9328656439 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454977913934 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15907957283 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109994117518 0.0662205650399 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302094094531 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476998642205 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.