The reading and the lecturer both discuss about appearance as guest of professors on TV. The reading states televesion apperance of professors is very benefical events for public, university, professor's themselves and brings up several reasons on this claim. The lecturer casts doubt on this claim and refutes eacf of the reasons.
First of all, the reading states that professors have benefit for appearing on television. Hoewever, the lecturer opposes that by saying professor who appears on TV generealy invited for entertainment rather than educational program. Therefore, their reputation will be bad for some of senior professor. As a result of reputation, they wil not invited to the important meeting. Hence, according to the professor, it will be bad for professor benefit.
Another reason the reading passage claims is that universities will benefit owing to apperance of their professor. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this reason by explaining that professor losts a lot of important time for travalling, rehearsing to television program. That's why, they will not study their research. Therefore, for lecturer, it will not a profit for the university.
Finally, the reading passage explains that the viewers gains from professor's apperance on TV. By contrast, the lecturer claims that TV network doesn't want deep academic information on TV programs. In contrast, viewers wants to watch some academic title or such current events so it will not be a benefit for viewers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rings up several reasons on this claim. The lecturer casts doubt on this claim and ...
^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ling, rehearsing to television program. Thats why, they will not study their research...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...st, the lecturer claims that TV network doesnt want deep academic information on TV pr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, nevertheless, so, therefore, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44396551724 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91052344096 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538793103448 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4400283907 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4666666667 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152964979942 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063220154078 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363462238686 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102289173101 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277362731743 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.