Professore are academic people and the reading claimes their appearance on TV is good for themselves and university and public as well. However, in the lecture, speakers makes a series of points that cast doubt on all the arguments presented in the reading passage.
First of all, in contrast to the author's claim, being in television is not beneficial for the professor standpoint. In other words, reputation of the professor who appears in tv would be considered a not serious scholar. Therefore, less invitation to academic conferences would be offered to them.
Moreover, the speaker refutes the idea of the author about the advantage for university for more popularity of their professors. She states that it is waste of their time. In fact they have to travel and spend some time to rehearse and be prepared for their speach and even do make up which could be used in better ways. It would be better for students to meet with their professor and use this time for their real responsibility.
Lastly, the speaker states that being in tv is not usefule for public as well. In other words, the tv programmer do not want some one with lots of knowledge they only want their title for their program. So, a reporter can present brief description instead of professor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...er words, the tv programmer do not want some one with lots of knowledge they only want t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le for their program. So, a reporter can present brief description instead of pro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, well, in contrast, in fact, first of all, in contrast to, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83027522936 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67207642572 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564220183486 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6526235962 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.75 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138538615772 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545945412549 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345026414326 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086622944955 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192636832976 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.