Question : Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
In the reading passage, the author feels that are three possible explanations for the cause of the Little Ice Age. However, finding all these ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented and states some evidence to the contrary.
To begin with, the author claims that the Little Ice Age may have been caused by disrupting of ocean currents. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. He argues that this theory does not justify the existence of this period in New Zealand, only in Europe and North America. Hence, he thinks that this ideia is faulty.
Secondly, the writer suggests that volcanic eruption could have caused the Little Ice Age. In contrast, this explanation is rejected by the lecture. He says that volcano eruption will not cause a large amount of dust to cause the Little Ice Age. Consequently, in his opinion this argument can not be true.
Finally, the reading presents that decreases in human populations may have contributed indirectly to the Little Ice Age. But, the professor rebuts this by mentioning that the time for occur the Little Ice Age is too short. Therefore, according to his opinion, the idea presented on the reading is questionable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 203.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04433497537 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64757130553 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556650246305 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8983827922 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.7692307692 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6153846154 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0381573394151 0.272083759551 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0174793180373 0.0996497079465 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0196567775393 0.0662205650399 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0271870343593 0.162205337803 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122571627156 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.