Reading: Appearence of Professor on Television is beneficial to Professors, university and public
Listening: Opposing view
The author of the article points out that the appearance of professors on television has great benefit for all - professor, university as well as to the public. However, the speaker of the lecture questions the view of benefit and points out some aspects of harmful effects about the appearance on Television.
The orator starts with the disadvantages that the professors have to face with the appearance on Television mainly based on the professionalism, seriousness character as a scholar and ignorance by intellectual community considering just as an entertainer. Further, She points out the waste of time the professor would have to face with the appearance in the television. S/He had to travel and reherse all those scripts as well as make ups. All these thing than a mere benefit are a distraction for the professor from his specific research.
After questioning the benefits to the professors, the orator questions the advantages to the university. Although, the author explains the increase in publicity and prospective students, if the above explained fact about the professor by speaker is true. Then, rather than increasing goodwill of the university it will decrease it. Along with the reputition, the funds for research and the ranking of the University will also go down. So, the direct relation of the professors with the University will surely hamper both of them if reputition of any one of them get hampered.
At last, the lecturer questions, what really will the public get? She further states the way that the public would like to hear from the professors. Most of the audience would prefer something entertaining and movie related subject to be discussed rather than scientific discoveries and other boring talks. So, the appearence of professors on Television and talking about his research will not have any audiences and its all just waste of time.
Thus, the speaker has pointed out some strong counterargument regarding the benefit for the professor, university and public with the professors dicussing in Television.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this thing' or 'these things'?
Suggestion: this thing; these things
... those scripts as well as make ups. All these thing than a mere benefit are a distraction f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, really, regarding, so, then, thus, well, as to, talking about, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 30.3222958057 181% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28267477204 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97653665047 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9680326792 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256383896709 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855348414245 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664533592542 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159169309921 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454267095747 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.