The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about computerize smart cars The writer claims several benefits by using this type of cars However the professor casts doubt on claim made in article She believes using computerize cars i snot clear ben

Essay topics:

The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about computerize smart cars. The writer claims several benefits by using this type of cars. However, the professor casts doubt on claim made in article. She believes, using computerize cars i snot clear beneficial.
First, the author states, smart cars will decrease roads accidents. He mentions, these cars have a good equipments like sensors. Moreover, they are automatic programed. This statement is challenged by professor. She illustrates to accidents that might happen if these technology fell. there are many reasons to that cause impairment of cars equipment. As a result, this benefit is not convincing.
I addition, the author asserts, using computerized cars will help to decrease traffic problems. These controled cars can move behind each other smoothly. Therefore, it will be able to allowed to increase high way speed. The lecture refutes this theory. She says, historically research show that people can easilly get drive experience with time. But with smart car, there is no increase in experience, because, these car are driven by technological devices which can not improve awareness with time like human being.
Finally, the passage elaborates on decreasing in the cost of driving as a consequent of using smart cars. The professor has opposite idea, She thinks, the equipments which are used to make smart cars like sensors and programed brakes are more expensive that money used for repair or change parts of ordinary cars. Furthermore, when any part of smart car damage, it is very expensive to replace it.

The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about comuterize smart cars. The writer claims several benefits by using this type of cars. However, the professor casts doubt on claim made in article. She believes, using computerize cars i snot clear beneficial.
First, the author states, smart cars will decrease roads accidents. He mentions, these cars have a good equipments like sensors. Moreover, they are automatic programed. This statement is challenged by professor. She illustrates to accidents that might happen if these technology fell. there are many reasons to that cause impairment of cars equipment. As a result, this benefit is not convincing.
I addition, the author asserts, using computerized cars will help to decrease traffic problems. These controled cars can move behind each other smoothly. Therefore, it will be able to allowed to increase high way speed. The lecture refutes this theory. She says, historically research show that people can easily get drive experience with time. But with smart car, there is no increase in experience, because, these car are driven by technological devices which can not improve awareness with time like human being.
Finally, the passage elaborates on decreasing in the cost of driving as a consequent of using smart cars. The professor has opposite idea, She thinks, the equipments which are used to make smart cars like sensors and programed brakes are more expensive that money used for repair or change parts of ordinary cars. Furthermore, when any part of smart car damage, it is very expensive to replace it.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-18 talelaldabous 78 view
2021-08-18 talelaldabous 78 view
2021-08-18 talelaldabous 78 view
2021-08-18 talelaldabous 78 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and the lecture are ...
^^
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'equipment'?
Suggestion: equipment
...s. He mentions, these cars have a good equipments like sensors. Moreover, they are automa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'these technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; these technologies
...rates to accidents that might happen if these technology fell. there are many reasons to that ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... might happen if these technology fell. there are many reasons to that cause impairme...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...research show that people can easily get drive experience with time. But with sma...
^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this car' or 'these cars'?
Suggestion: this car; these cars
... is no increase in experience, because, these car are driven by technological devices whi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...awareness with time like human being. Finally, the passage elaborates on decre...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, talking about, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24015748031 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67761980858 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645669291339 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 3.25607064018 430% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5607988374 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.55 110.228320801 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.7 21.698381199 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.481003810946 0.272083759551 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129714091533 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101876715893 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313775042383 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20935291873 0.0443174109184 472% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.22 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 10.7273730684 37% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.