The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about humpback whales migrations. And how these animals control long distances migration. The writer claims, humpback whales use stars as navigation. He gives several evidences to support his point of view. However, the professor believes that the evidences to explain that humpback use stars for migration are not convincing.
In the beginning, the writer states, humpback whales have intelligent enough to enable them to move according to stars. The lecturer casts doubt this statement. He mentions, there is no relation between intelligent and using stars for navigation. Moreover, many birds can migrate by relying on stars and have limited intelligent ability. For example ducks depend on stars in migration, these ducks have very low rate on intelligent. As a result, humpback whales intelligence has no connection with using of stars as navigation.
In addition, the author elaborates on straight lines migration of whales. He states, long distance straight movement need external signs as stars to move in straight line. The professor refutes this argument. He mentions straight line movement depend on magnetic external field to orient direction of migration. humpback whales have bio magnetic force that help them to migrate in this manner. Therefore, they do not rely on stars for movement.
Ultimately, the author illustrates to spy-hopping behavior of whales which mean that whales looking at sky when move their head above. The speaker mentions, many animals have same behavior like whales. Sharks do not migrate. They spy-hopping to hunt. In addition, humpback spy-hopping not only in night. So there is no connection between spy-hopping and using stars for navigation.
The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about humpback whales migrations. And how these animals control long distances migration. The writer claims, humpback whales use stars as navigation. He gives several evidences to support his point of view. However, the professor believes that the evidences to explain that humpback use stars for migration are not convincing.
In the beginning, the writer states, humpback whales have intelligent enough to enable them to move according to stars. The lecturer casts doubt this statement. He mentions, there is no relation between intelligent and using stars for navigation. Moreover, many birds can migrate by relying on stars and have limited intelligent ability. For example ducks depend on stars in migration, these ducks have very low rate on intelligent. As a result, humpback whales intelligence has no connection with using of stars as navigation.
In addition, the author elaborates on straight lines migration of whales. He states, long distance straight movement need external signs as stars to move in straight line. The professor refutes this argument. He mentions straight line movement depend on magnetic external field to orient direction of migration. humpback whales have bio magnetic force that help them to migrate in this manner. Therefore, they do not rely on stars for movement.
Ultimately, the author illustrates to spy-hopping behavior of whales which mean that whales looking at sky when move their head above. The speaker mentions, many animals have same behavior like whales. Sharks do not migrate. They spy-hopping to hunt. In addition, humpback spy-hopping not only in night. So there is no connection between spy-hopping and using stars for navigation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Humpback
...field to orient direction of migration. humpback whales have bio magnetic force that hel...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in addition, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 5.01324503311 439% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44814814815 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75950781878 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525925925926 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5455817148 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.9565217391 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.7391304348 21.698381199 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43185739085 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119137420971 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114074922859 0.0662205650399 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297932155601 0.162205337803 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.264250628885 0.0443174109184 596% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.15 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.