The reading passage and the lecture both talk about carved stone balls which are a type of artifacts found in Scotland The writers proposes these stones have especial meaning and purpose However the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She believ

Essay topics:

The reading passage and the lecture both talk about carved stone balls , which are a type of artifacts found in Scotland. The writers proposes, these stones have especial meaning and purpose. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She believes, non of these purpose are convincing.
In the beginning, the author states, these stone might be used as weapons. he mentions, these is hole and groove in stone, This might indicate that cord was passed though it. Person can swing it and throw. This point is challenged by lecturer, She mentions, weapons like arrow should show signs of war. Even, there is no sign indicated in these stone, In addition, stones had cracks and damage. Therefore, these carved bvall can not be used as weapons.
Furthermore, the author cites, these stones have standerd weight. They could be uses as measuring system. The professor refutes this notion. She says, stones made of different materials like limestone and sand stone. Each one has different density. Moreover, two stone might have same size, but, different weight . Therefore, this purpose is not practical.
Finally, the reading passage suggests, carved stones used as social purpose. Elaborate carving means stones may have important social purpose of their owners. The professor contradicts this argument. She mentions, some balls have very simple designs. Moreover, if they used as social status, we never see an y of them burird with their owners like king and famous people did. In conclusion, these stones do not have any social meaning on their owners.

The reading passage and the lecture both talk about carved stone balls , which are a type of artifacts found in Scotland. The writers proposes, these stons have especial meaning and purpose. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She believes, non of these purpose are convincing.
In the beginning, the author states, these stone might be used as weapons. he mentions, these is hole and groove in stone, This might indicate that cord was paased though it. Person can swing it and throw. This point is challenged by lecturer, She mentions, weapons like arrow should showe signs of war. Even, there is no sign indicated in these stone, In addition, stones had cracks and damage. Therefore, these carved ball can not be used as weapons.
Furthermore, the author cites, these stones have standerd weight. They could be uses as measuring system. The professor refutes this notion. She says, stones made of different materials like limestone and sand stone. Each one has different density. Moreover, two stone might have same size, but, different weight . Therefore, this purpose is not practical.
Finally, the reading passage suggests, carved stones used as social purpose. Elaborate carving means stones may have important social purpose of their owners. The professor contradicts this argument. She mentions, some balls have very simbile designs. Moreover, if they used as social status, we never see an y of them burird with their owners like king and famous people did. In conclusion, these stones do not have any social meaning on their owners.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-17 talelaldabous 65 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cture both talk about carved stone balls , which are a type of artifacts found in ...
^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'propose'.
Suggestion: propose
...rtifacts found in Scotland. The writers proposes, these stons have especial meaning and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 76, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
..., these stone might be used as weapons. he mentions, these is hole and groove in s...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arved ball can not be used as weapons. Furthermore, the author cites, these sto...
^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ht have same size, but, different weight . Therefore, this purpose is not practica...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...refore, this purpose is not practical. Finally, the reading passage suggests, c...
^^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...hey used as social status, we never see an y of them burird with their owners like...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15294117647 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39725981236 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61568627451 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 3.25607064018 491% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2106487833 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 57.1304347826 110.228320801 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.0869565217 21.698381199 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.17391304348 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.27373068433 304% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435698715853 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116468889461 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128215656589 0.0662205650399 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30435075693 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.230847125728 0.0443174109184 521% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.3589403974 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 53.8541721854 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.41 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.