The reading passage and lecture have a conflicting opinions about wether or not Peary reached the north pole. The article strongly postulates that there some doubts from hisorians about the Peary trip, but there is three discussions supports that Peary was telling the truth. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delinates that these three arguments aren't solid and convincing evidence about Peary trip.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, An ograniztaion called Natioan Geographic Society investigated Peary records and equipment. Therefore, the result exhibited that Peary was telling the truth. Nonetheless, the lecture offsets these points by declaring that The National Geographic society members who works on Peary case didn't imply any objection. Also, the member who assigned to work in this case were peary friends, besides it took only two days to declare the result. As a result, the report wasn't examined carefully.
The professor in the lecture further points out that the British explorer named Avery did the trip conditons that are different from Peary trip. For instance, he wasn't carrying food, he got the food from a plane. Also, he did the trip in a good conditions. These claims refutre the writer implication of how Peary acclaimed that he reached the north pole in 37 days.
The article laslty asserts that there were a photos was taken by Peary show that he was in the north pole. Moreover, the scientis analayzed Pearty photos in order to calculate the sun position and the results show that he was at the north pole. The speaker in the lecture counters these points by insisting that the thechnology that was used to examine the photos wasn't accurate enough to tell that was in the north pole. However, the photos faded with time and shadow was blur. As a result, the photos didn't support that he was at the north pole.
The reading passage and lecture have a conflicting opinions about whether or not Peary reached the north pole. The article strongly postulates that there some doubts from hisorians about the Peary trip, but there are three discussions supports that Peary was telling the truth. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delinates that these three arguments aren't solid and convincing evidence about Peary trip.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, An oganiztaion called Natioanl Geographic Society investigated Peary records and equipment. Therefore, the result exhibited that Peary was telling the truth. Nonetheless, the lecture offsets these points by declaring that The National Geographic society members who works on Peary case didn't imply any objection. Also, the member who assigned to work in this case were peary friends, besides it took only two days to declare the result. As a result, the report wasn't examined carefully.
The professor in the lecture further points out that the British explorer named Avery did the trip conditons that are different from Peary trip. For instance, he wasn't carrying food, he got the food from a plane. Also, he did the trip in a good conditions. These claims refute the writer implication of how Peary acclaimed that he reached the north pole in 37 days.
The article laslty asserts that there were photos was taken by Peary show that he was in the north pole. Moreover, the scientist analyzed Pearty photos in order to calculate the sun position and the results show that he was at the north pole. The speaker in the lecture counters these points by insisting that the technology that was used to examine the photos wasn't accurate enough to tell that he was in the north pole. However, the photos faded with time and shadow was blur. As a result, the photos didn't support that he was at the north pole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opinion'?
Suggestion: opinion
... passage and lecture have a conflicting opinions about whether or not Peary reached the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...cture have a conflicting opinions about whether or not Peary reached the north pole. The artic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ly delinates that these three arguments arent solid and convincing evidence about Pea...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Natioanl Geographic Society investigated Peary records and equipment. Therefore, ...
^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...society members who works on Peary case didnt imply any objection. Also, the member w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...are the result. As a result, the report wasnt examined carefully. The professor in...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...erent from Peary trip. For instance, he wasnt carrying food, he got the food from a p...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 362, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ogy that was used to examine the photos wasnt accurate enough to tell that he was in ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 504, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...hadow was blur. As a result, the photos didnt support that he was at the north pole. ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pport that he was at the north pole.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01592356688 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4026356611 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522292993631 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5904289328 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6470588235 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427620248298 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146122666006 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173348945523 0.0662205650399 262% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295495238041 0.162205337803 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.26570003493 0.0443174109184 600% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.