Reading
The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers’ crops by eating harmful insects. Unfortunately, the toad multiplied rapidly, and a large cane toad population now threatens small native animals that are not pests. Several measures have been proposed to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia.
One way to prevent the spread of the toad would be to build a national fence. A fence that blocks the advance of the toads will prevent them from moving into those parts of Australia that they have not yet colonized. This approach has been used before: a national fence was erected in the early part of the twentieth century to prevent the spread of rabbits, another animal species that was introduced in Australia from abroad and had a harmful impact on its native ecosystems.
Second, the toads could be captured and destroyed by volunteers. Cane toads can easily be caught in simple traps and can even be captured by hand. Young toads and cane toad eggs are even easier to gather and destroy, since they are restricted to the water. If the Australian government were to organize a campaign among Australian citizens to join forces to destroy the toads, the collective effort might stop the toad from spreading.
Third, researchers are developing a disease-causing virus to control the cane toad populations. This virus will be specially designed: although it will be able to infect a number of reptile and amphibian species, it will not harm most of the infected species; it will specifically harm only the cane toads. The virus will control the population of cane toads by preventing them from maturing and reproducing.
the article states that the large reproducing of cane toads, amphibian species that protect crops by eating harmful insects, could become a serious danger for other native animals in australia rather than pests, and provides three proposals for stop their spread in australia. However, the professor says that those proposals are both unseccessfully efforts and lead to environmental damages, and refutes each of the author's proposals.
first, the reading cliams that primitive way to prohibite the spread of the cane toads is erect a national fence. the professor opposes this point by saying that toad's eggs and also young toads can replaced to one side another far from the national fence by streams and runoff waters. according to the professor this method seems unlikely be effective.
second, the article posits that volunteers can capture and destroy the toads easily through using the simple traps and even by hands. In contrast, the professor says that untrained volunteers neither can be effective nor can remain intact others animals frogs.
third, the reading says that using virus to control maturing and reproducing of toads populations. the professor casts doubt on this proposal by explaining that this process have been uesd in order to control other animal like reptiles and cause serious damages to those species. she also states that using the virus for this propuse are illegal and not only have nagetively effects on ecosystems but also suffering some sort of injury to other part of environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the article states that the large reproduci...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...tes each of the authors proposals. first, the reading cliams that primitive way ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e cane toads is erect a national fence. the professor opposes this point by saying ...
^^^
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...nal fence by streams and runoff waters. according to the professor this method seems unli...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...ethod seems unlikely be effective. second, the article posits that volunteers can...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
...emain intact others animals frogs. third, the reading says that using virus to c...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...g and reproducing of toads populations. the professor casts doubt on this proposal ...
^^^
Line 10, column 281, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...cause serious damages to those species. she also states that using the virus for th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, third, in contrast, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2868852459 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49007705522 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602459016393 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0348980193 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111970396681 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397906408506 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693209799219 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686952841823 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725612123632 0.0443174109184 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.