Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People have differing views with regard to both the significance of the internet and the idea that governments should provide it free. While some people hold the idea that internet services are like other public services and states must offer them at no cost, In my oopinion offering free internet is not applicable, and I disagree with this assertion.
The first reason is that having the internet access is most important just like other public services. Obviously, a well-developed country must meet all changing needs of its residents. In this term, progress in various areas such as transport network, healthcare, education system, and security is just a reflection of development of that country. Internet access, in this technological development era, plays a vital role in this notion. For example, people by internet accessibility, can access information ranging from global news to online cources in all over the world. As a result, a well-made public services can help countries to derive their goals successfully.
The second reason is that all public services rely on state subsidies to keep working. This means that resident populations already pay money to these services through the tax system. While Some of these public services such as roads, also, receive tolls from travellers to support themselves, there are other services, the police or fire brigades, for example, that people do not use them in their lives at all but pay for them through tax system. However, I believe that providing internet at no cost is shortsighted view because states need to cover runing costs including employees' wages, payment for building, utilities and so forth just like other services mentioned above. On the top of these costs, governments have to invest in innovation and improvement if the(y) wish to remain successful. Finally, providing internet access for residents needs money, and people should have a positive contribution to support states in this matter.
In conclusion, it is clear that internet access is as significant as other public services, I believe that providing it at no cost is not practical.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'frees'?
Suggestion: frees
...idea that governments should provide it free. While some people hold the idea that i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 609, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'service'?
Suggestion: service
... world. As a result, a well-made public services can help countries to derive their goal...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26392961877 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80533138148 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539589442815 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5813969122 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367460964582 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121927240424 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803965861629 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243072390932 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249444202749 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.