Recently, there has been a debate about the private collectors. Private collectors are persons interested in selling and buying animals fossils.

Essay topics:

Recently, there has been a debate about the private collectors. Private collectors are persons interested in selling and buying animals fossils.

Recently, there has been a debate about the private collectors. Private collectors are persons interested in selling and buying animals fossils. Are they have a good or bad impact on the science?. The author in the reading passage raises three strong points against private collectors, While the professor in the reading passage seriously challenges these points.
First of all, the author assumes that private collectors approach may decrease public chance to see fossils and reduce their access to them. Conversely, the lecturer contends that private collectors make fossils more accessible to the public. Furthermore, every time that they sell fossils, the schools, universities, and anyone interesting in fossils can come and see them or buy them as well. So the lecture gives another side of view regarding fossils access.
Second, the reading material claims that private collectors decrease scientists opportunity to make new discoveries, as they trade these fossils for their own sake. However, the professor opposes this idea by saying that each fossil, in order to be evaluated has to pass through scientists. More ever, scientists only can say if these fossils worth money or not. So, scientists access to fossil would be crucial in this process. Thus, the lecture successfully argues the second point in the text.
Finally, the author has a concern regarding the damaging to fossils that may happen during the excavation because of the lack of experiences of private collectors. Admittedly, the professor assumes the truth of this concern but, on the other hand, he questions if private collectors do not search for fossil, then, who would do that?. Universities and private constitution do not have enough money to do all these steps. Therefore, we have to accept small damage in order to get benefits from the huge amount of fossils that have discovered by private collectors.
Ideally, the lecture has given strong evidence to argue against the theories that have been raising by the author about the harmless of private collectors on science.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, there has been a debate about ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age seriously challenges these points. First of all, the author assumes that pr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...side of view regarding fossils access. Second, the reading material claims that...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y argues the second point in the text. Finally, the author has a concern regard...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have discovered by private collectors. Ideally, the lecture has given strong ev...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27659574468 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67321383184 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544072948328 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3246786229 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4444444444 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94444444444 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354906362762 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133542516627 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190586086949 0.0662205650399 288% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219530324953 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171031387804 0.0443174109184 386% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.