Rembrandt
According to the lecture, the painting "Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet" is actually painted by Rembrandt. The speaker in the lecture gives the following points to prove the case.
First, the speaker says that the fur collar that the woman is wearing was not the part of the original painting and was added later on. So, this disproves the passage that the white linen cap which the servants wear and the luxurious fur collar coat in the painting cannot be the work of Rembrandt.
Second, the speaker mentions that since the fur collar was later added to the coat so it perfectly matches with the light pattern on the face of the woman in the original painting by Rembrandt. The coat that Rembrandt painted was of light color and so it reflected the light and that illuminated the face. As a result, Rembrandt did not make an error but he fitted the elements of light and shadow perfectly as per his style.
Third, the speaker states that the initial painting was made on a wood panel and there were no other pieces of wood glued together. However, later on pieces of wood were added and glued to the initial wooden panel in order to make extra room to paint the fur collar.
Further, the speaker mentions that the wood panel used for this painting was taken from the same tree that Rembrandt used for the wood panel for his other painting. So, it proves that this painting was also painted by Rembrandt.
Therefore, according to the speaker the above points prove that Rembrandt was the original painter. So, this painting is now added in his official catalog.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke extra room to paint the fur collar. Further, the speaker mentions that the w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, second, so, therefore, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70106761566 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33913700118 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427046263345 0.540411800872 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2102510446 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.615384615 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230013043469 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112556522722 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931583877418 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144610333531 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782340456951 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.