In this set of materials, the reading and the listening are both discussing a portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet wherein the reading states that the painting was not done by the Dutch master and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the painting was done by Rembrandt and refutes each of the author's points.
First of all, the author of the reading claims that the woman’s outfit is inconsistent, as it pairs a servant’s cap with a luxurious coat and fur collar. She or He believes that Rembrandt would not have made such a mistake, as he paid very careful attention to detail. The professor refutes this point by saying that the women’s fur collar was added to the painting by another artist at a later date. Furthermore, he points out that this was likely done to increase the value of the painting.
Secondly, the author states that the depiction of light and shadow in the portrait is poorly done. She or he argues that Rembrandt would have made the mistakes which are seen in this particular painting. However, the professor states that when the aforementioned fur collar is removed, no mistakes with light and shadow remain. He puts forth the idea that the original version of the painting is up to Rembrandt’s usual standards.
Finally, the author mentions that the portrait was painted on a series of panels which were glued together. She or He notes that while Rembrandt often painted on wood panels, there is no evidence that he ever used panels that were glued together in such a fashion. The professor opposes this point by explaining that the wood panel was expanded many years after the painting was originally done. he elaborates on this by mentioning that this is evidence that the painting was originally completed in just a single panel like other works by Rembrandt.
In conclusion, the three points that made in the lecture contrast with the reading. The first, second and third points in the lecture demonstrate that the painting was not done by Dutch master is in doubt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 397, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...after the painting was originally done. he elaborates on this by mentioning that t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, third, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 352.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86647727273 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66275334175 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460227272727 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9357021559 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0625 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229709993811 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847942915088 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062437304741 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142076880137 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665408508068 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.