Rembrandt's Painting
The Author and The Lecturer are concerned ( mistake concern) about the originality of Rembrandt's painting. As much as they discuss one of his famous artworks " Portrait of an Elderly Woman". In the reading passage, the author claims that this portrait is not an original one. The speaker, however, opposes the writer. She says that after re-examination by ( mistake through) scientists, it is found that the painting was modified. This portrait belongs only to Rembrandt's work.
First, The author mentions that Rembrandt was known for the details of his paintings. But, in the portrait, Lady's (mistake lady) dress does not show consistency with the theme of the painting. The speaker refutes the claim by saying that after scientific analysis, it is found that the portrait was repainted in order to improve its (mistake its) appearance. In reality, the dress of the lady in the painting perfectly matches ( mistake used with) the theme.
Secondly, The author states that Rembrandt was a master in painting light and shadow. However, the shadow that appears on the lady's face is not in coordination with the light on her fur. The speaker refutes the argument. She says that when we remove the upper layer of the painting, we will be able to see that Rembrandt's artwork is original.
Lastly, The author mentions that Rembrandt never used to draw his painting on a wooden panel which is combined by using different wood pieces. The professor denies this fact. She mentions that additional wood pieces are only used to enlarge the boundaries of the painting while the portrait is still drawn on single wood. Further, she states that the painting is drawn on the same wooden material which was used by the Rembrandt for most of his other paintings
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he Author and The Lecturer are concerned mistake concern about the originality of...
^^
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r. She says that after re-examination by mistake through scientists, it is found ...
^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e lady in the painting perfectly matches mistake used with the theme. Secondly...
^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he painting, we will be able to see that Rembrandts artwork is original. Last...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99315068493 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55308621133 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493150684932 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0051978251 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327126462899 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102954264854 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117072085612 0.0662205650399 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210932872804 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748173521719 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.