the passage's author and the professor both talked about a salty lake in America, the passage offered some solution to make the lake less salty like it's before's days, but on the other hands, the lecturer was against all of the solutions and she made some reasonable statements to be disagree with what the passage states.
First of all, the passage mentioned we can remove the salt from the lake by removing the salt in a process which would warm up the water and make it to the gas and collect the salts and again colding the water and putting it back to the lake, nevertheless, the lecturer asserts the salt which would remain from this process in that system, would make toxic gasses and would be unhealthy for people
second the passage's author asserts another solution which is moving water from ocean to the lake to make the percentage of water more and make the lake less salty, the lecturer however disagree suggesting that it would need a huge money which government may can not afford it because this for building the system which this idea needs, you should make pipelines in kilometers and it would be really expensive
the last key point passages' author said is to build some walls in the lake, but the lecturer acclaimed that it's not practical because it would be destroyed after the first earthquake
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the passages author and the professor both ...
^^^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e other hands, the lecturer was against all of the solutions and she made some reasonable ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be destroyed after the first earthquake
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, nevertheless, really, second, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68534482759 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23868787346 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508620689655 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 13.0662251656 15% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 116.0 21.2450331126 546% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 335.5 49.2860985944 681% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 543.5 110.228320801 493% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 116.0 21.698381199 535% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 45.5 7.06452816374 644% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2162107472 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165799240981 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284987374121 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140187435925 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167049912514 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 58.7 13.3589403974 439% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -37.8 53.8541721854 -70% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 47.4 11.0289183223 430% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.11 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.98 8.42419426049 142% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 10.7273730684 247% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 48.4 10.498013245 461% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.