Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is
The article states that sending humans to Mars needs to solve the perplexing problems that the Moon project did not have to face and solve. And provide three reasons for support.
However, the professor explains that a trip to Mars is a challenging commute, but it is possible and practicable and refutes each author's reasons.
First, the reading states that the cargo capacity to sending the survival requirement such as food, water, and oxygen is limited, so the crew can not survive for two years; the professor refutes this point by stating that the Hydroponic plant can compensate for the food, water as well as oxygen requisites, The Hydroponic plant grow in water-based habitat, it need not to soil to grow, on the top of everything else, the Hydroponic plants not only absorb Co2, but also produce O2, and by doing so, it helps to maintain o2 level correctly.
Second, the article claims that zero gravity in mars could produce health anomalies, such as decreased muscle mass and lower bone density. However, the professor contends that humans had several lunches to the moon in a zero-gravity situation. Hence, this problem has several solutions. To be more specific, regular exercises the Calcium pills would be useful to the bone density.
Third, the reading avers that the astronauts would be exposed to radiation of the sun, which is dangerous to humans, requires a shield to protect from solar radiation that makes spacecraft weightier than usual. The lecturer opposes these points by saying that this radiation is not dangerous; this occasional radiation can compensate by constructing a small shield in spacecraft. After increasing radiation, astronauts can go through this shield immediately.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 371, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'soil'?
Suggestion: soil
...row in water-based habitat, it need not to soil to grow, on the top of everything else,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20863309353 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69211862986 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58273381295 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 131.459952108 49.2860985944 267% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 131.636363636 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104135957343 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428929340856 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600525610451 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704093415038 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057261724186 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.