Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus the project of sending humans to Mars would require solving an array of problems the Moon missions did not have to face.
As it was mentioned in the passage considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars creates an array of problems that have to be solved for a mission like this to occur. Nevertheless, the professor disagrees. She implies that there are several solutions to these problems.
First, the writer mentions that a round-trip to Mars and back takes at least two years. In addition, a long-lasting trip requires an abundant amount of supply. The lecturer, on the other hand, points out that although supplying the travel can be challenging but it is not impossible. Because there have been some solutions like growing plants in water instead of soil. For more explanation, not only can growing plants in water recycle the water and later used as freshwater for occupants but also can produce fresh air for them.
Second, the passage explains that zero gravity can cause too much damage for participants that make the trip impossible. In contrast, the professor states that some astronauts have found some techniques for resisting the damage caused by a long amount of time in zero gravity. For example, taking vitamins and regular exercise. In this way, a long trip can be plausible.
Third, the author indicates that dangerous emissions of the sun can cause too much damage. However, the lecturer rebuts this argument and goes on to elaborate that space radiation only occurs occasionally. Moreover, some detectors can be used to alarm the occupants to stay in the spaceship that can be shield low weight protections. Therefore this issue can be solved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e challenging but it is not impossible. Because there have been some solutions like gro...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...t can be shield low weight protections. Therefore this issue can be solved.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, at least, for example, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07364341085 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72680134704 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585271317829 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4483727662 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1764705882 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0740008664315 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0262729455424 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441069953985 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.056770817885 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058936599157 0.0443174109184 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.