smart cars
In this set of material, the reading passage discusses that using the computer- controlling smart cars would promise safer, faster and cheaper transportation than mechanical cars. While the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the listening and believes that none of the proposed reasons can prove the benefits of smart cars over traditional cars.
First of all, in the text, it is clearly mentioned that smart cars will prevent accidents. However, the professor claims that it is possible that smart cars sensors fail in determining the distance or other variables. So, because cars are more tightly drive together, any accidents will create more extensive damage to cars and people.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that smart cars can reduce commuting time and traffic. She says that because of the exceptional benefits of smart cars more and more people will become willing to buy and drive them. Whereby, through additional cars in the highways, any benefits about declining traffic and faster movement will become ineffective.
Finally, yet importantly, In the text, it is stated that smart cars will decrease the repair and maintaining cost. The professor subscribes that because smart cars use from high tech technology, so their maintenance cost will be significantly higher than usual repair of traditional mechanical cars.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38139534884 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69987881065 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572093023256 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3209195267 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.7 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514158510277 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.244292320946 0.0996497079465 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631856531292 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348704232877 0.162205337803 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555910054386 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.