solution to prevent the spread of toads
The lecture and the passage discuss about three ways to control the population of the toads which harms the crops. Although the passage claims that by building national fences, capturing toads and developing a virus the toys could be destroyed, the speaker refutes these ideas through number of reasons which will described in this report.
First of all, the passage point out that by establishing a national fence the toads could be prevent to spread and it blocks the moving of them to the australia. The professor, in contrast, rejects this idea by claiming that the youngest toads could move through the fences and these fences are not effective solution. In addition their eggs might be placed in 2 sides of the fences and the eggs which are in country side could grow either. So this idea cannot prevent the toads from moving to those parts of australia.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that the toad could be captured by voulenteer people and the australia government should organize a campaign among citizen to join this work, the speaker argues that untrained people could harm the native species of country such as frogs and their activities might be harmful for environment. As a result, this solution is not a perfect idea to control the spread of toads.
Finally, although the passage says that researchers could develop a virus controling the toads population, the professor disagrees by mentioning that this idea might has a great consequence. by developing a virus original habitat could be harmed as well as situation which was happened in america. an infected animal which were transported to america polluted other species and resulting a devistated in population of animals in that environments. Therefore the idea of developing virus is not a reliable solution to control the toads’ population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...e fences are not effective solution. In addition their eggs might be placed in 2 sides o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'toads'' or 'toad's'?
Suggestion: toads'; toad's
...rs could develop a virus controling the toads population, the professor disagrees by ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...his idea might has a great consequence. by developing a virus original habitat cou...
^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: An
...ituation which was happened in america. an infected animal which were transported ...
^^
Line 7, column 449, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lation of animals in that environments. Therefore the idea of developing virus is not a r...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, so, therefore, well, in addition, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13289036545 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68114751603 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508305647841 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7869774544 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21483202526 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951849375156 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863493034552 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125851777273 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432899554829 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.