The article and lecture debate over advantages and disadvantages of smart car.The article states that smart cars ensure safe, faster and economical driving. However the professor casts doubts over these benifits and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, reading claims that smart cars ensure safe driving and they protect lives by thwrting accdidents. The professor refutes this point by saying that after all even the advanced devices often fail to carry out their task. Since, large number of smart cars are moving together and they are tightly packed accidents rate will culminate and its effect will be more worse.
Second, the article posits that with increased usage of smart cars traffic problems will vanish and individuals will be greatly benifited by the high speed feature of smart car. However the professor says according to history, whenever some convinience such as smart cars are introduced more people tend to drive these cars. As a result, with rise in number of cars on the road, traffic conjection will emerge. Hence, high speet feature of car can't be utilized and commute hours will not be reduced.
Third, the reading says that maintenance cost of driving smart cars would be less. The professor opposes this point by explaining that equipment used in smart cars are costlier than conventional cars. Global Positioning System used to direct the car and sensor to detect how far is the next car are very expensive. In addition to this repair of the damaged part is costly as well. So, if we combine these expenses, it will be far greater than the money that could be spent on maintenance of conventional cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...vantages and disadvantages of smart car.The article states that smart cars ensure s...
^^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...re safe, faster and economical driving. However the professor casts doubts over these b...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worse' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worse
...e will culminate and its effect will be more worse. Second, the article posits that wit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...by the high speed feature of smart car. However the professor says according to history...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...merge. Hence, high speet feature of car cant be utilized and commute hours will not ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, well, after all, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03296703297 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39425979673 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575091575092 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9034870234 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1428571429 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247960477076 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933132365184 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688244979937 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153946561989 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051266203562 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.