Summaries the points made in the lecture,being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. two hypotheses about see otters populations declining
The reading and lecture are both about two hypotheses, which each of them can confirm the causes of sea otter populations decreasing. The author of reading believes that there are some reasons that can support the pollution hypothesis. The lecture challenges the statements made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that predators' hypothesis can better explain the causes of otter populations declining.
First of all, the author suggests that on the Alaskan coast there were sources of pollution such as oil rigs and industrial chemical substances. This claim is challenged by the lecture. She says no one can discover Dead Sea otters on Alaskan beaches. Furthermore, he argues that this is hard to find death sea otter, so it can prove the predator's hypothesis because predators killed the sea otters then ate them. Consequently, there were not any sea otter wash up onshore.
Secondly, the writer contends that other mammals were declined at that time, therefore this event shows this fact that there was a main factor which affected the whole ecosystem. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that in the Alaskan, orcas hunted whales, but whales killed by a human, so there were no whales for eating orcas. She elaborates on this by mentioning that the orcas should change their nourishment and ate small sea mammals like sea otters and sea lions, therefore this caused their populations were declined during the time.
Finally, it is stated in the article that pollution can clarify the uneven pattern of otter decline because otter populations shrank greatly, but others were stable. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that the unequal motif can explain by the orcas because they could access the sea otters place. Thus, the orcas chased them ant it caused otter populations decreased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t can support the pollution hypothesis. The lecture challenges the statements made ...
^^^
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nges the statements made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that predat...
^^^
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'predators'' or 'predator's'?
Suggestion: predators'; predator's
...r. The professor is of the opinion that predators hypothesis can better explain the cause...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'predators'' or 'predator's'?
Suggestion: predators'; predator's
...nd death sea otter, so it can prove the predators hypothesis because predators killed the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11744966443 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50852561861 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536912751678 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3182758934 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151073201586 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605648343696 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391626229368 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104558574195 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534265855343 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.