Summarise the points made in the lecture,being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

Essay topics:

Summarise the points made in the lecture,being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

Both the lecture and reading discuss regarding four-day employees. The points in the lecture dispute assertion made in the passage emphatically articulating that four-day workers are more beneficial than five-day workers.

According to the passage, four-day employees make fewer costly errors since they can rest more. Moreover, companies will pay less for four-day employees, therefore, they will obtain further benefits by reducing their expense. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this idea by providing the fact that companies should hire new four-day employees in order to make up the workload whereby they should spend more money to train new employees, provide more office space and health insurance for them.

Furthermore, the reading posits that hiring four-day employees means that full-time employees should work fewer hours and their workload will be shift warded to others, hence, the rate of unemployment will be reduced. While the speaker strongly rebuts this idea by mentioning that if companies find that four-day employees cannot do the same job as five-day employees did, their expectation will raise whereby employees should work much more for less pay, therefore, the work atmosphere will become more unpleasant.

Finally, the lecturer clearly contradicts the claim, which four-day employees have more free time to spend with their family to improve the quality of their life, uttering that four-day employees will lose the stability of their work, get less promotion in their work or maybe they will even get fired in economic recession. Consequently, their life become more stressful and unpleasant.

Summing it up, although the reading states that four-day employees reduce errors during work, create more opportunities for others and improve the quality of employees’ life but the lecturer presents logical reason against this idea.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore beneficial than five-day workers. According to the passage, four-day emplo...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... space and health insurance for them. Furthermore, the reading posits that hir...
^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...the reading posits that hiring four-day employees means that full-time employees should w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mosphere will become more unpleasant. Finally, the lecturer clearly contradict...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...become more stressful and unpleasant. Summing it up, although the reading stat...
^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts logical reason against this idea.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65492957746 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61233436132 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556338028169 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.8746972784 49.2860985944 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.6 110.228320801 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 21.698381199 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0546350560533 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332836176974 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351824922153 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0412148810693 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388740924766 0.0443174109184 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.3589403974 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.