Summarize the main points made in the lecture that just heard, discussing how they cast doubt on points made in the reading. You can refer to the reading passage as you write(Extracted from the Complete guid to the TOEFL test, Practice test 2, Integrated

The lecture and reading passage explain the impact of tourism industry in the economy, especially the eco-tourism. While the article states the benefits of it, the professor argues that, although this segment has some advantages, it has also some disadvantages. Besides, she gave arguments to each reason presented in the passage.

To begin, the author states that eco-tourism has less impact in the environment. On the contrary, the lecturer does not agree mentioning that when people will create all the infrastructure, they could damage the environment and pollute the air and water.

Second, in the passage is mentioned that the government when approves the development of an eco-tourism area, it will protect the animals that live in there. However, this is criticized by the professor when she claims that government has not intentions to protect this area. For example, some people are corrupted in the government, and others can hunt illegally or exploit the goods without any .

Another point mentioned in the passage is that the local people can get a job, so they can improve their living conditions. However, the professor argues that people from other areas can offer their work, so the salary could be lower.

To conclude, the lecturer mentions that eco-tourism development has benefits, but it is not the perfect solution.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...legally or exploit the goods without any . Another point mentioned in the passa...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, second, so, while, for example, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27441860465 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80485261943 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576744186047 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1768616578 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.090909091 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0854556524514 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327034872541 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387371985191 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0471737564645 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327204271714 0.0443174109184 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.