summarize the point made in the lecture, make sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The text and the lecture offer two opposing views about the methods that have been proposed to prevent decline of frog populations. While the passage states several methods to prevent frogs from declination, the professor casts doubt on those methods, stating that the methods are not practical.
First, the lecturer challenges the idea that farmers should not use harmful pesticides. He mentions it decreases many economical profits. Though the text states that by not using pesticides frogs would not be effected more, the speaker mentions whether farmers do not use pesticides, they cannot compete with others in markets and cause severe disadvantages for them than other farmer who use pesticides in other parts of the world.
Second, according to the reading researchers have discovered several methods to treat infection. However, the speaker questions this, arguing that the treatment should be individually to each frogs which is difficult. Additionally, he said the treatment cannot prevent infection which it need to be do repeatedly, so it will be complicated as well as expensive.
Finally, the instructor refutes the idea that waters should be prevented from excessive water use and development. He mentions excessive water use is not the problem, global warming is the real problem. Although the passage states by preventing excessive use of water, many frog species would recover, the lecturer argues it is global warming that cause extinction to many wetland habitats.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | rsheth05 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | prakriti malla | 90 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | GRACE_047 | 73 | view |
- Some people think playing computer games are a waste of time for children Do you agree or disagree with the statement Use specific details and examples to support your opinion 66
- summarize the point made in the lecture make sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 63
- Summarize the points made in the lecture be in sure in how the professor casts doubt on specific ideas made in the reading passage 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The text and the lecture offer two oppos...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng that the methods are not practical. First, the lecturer challenges the idea ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esticides in other parts of the world. Second, according to the reading researc...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l be complicated as well as expensive. Finally, the instructor refutes the idea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4224137931 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75359186031 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573275862069 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5388474311 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.363636364 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0559944606994 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0228877683044 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025496667831 0.0662205650399 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0354904957248 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223649969939 0.0443174109184 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.