Summarize the points made in the lecture.
The given text and the lecture is about the argument that if dinosaurs are endothermic or not. The author of the passage strongly argue that dinosaurs are endothermic based on presence of different characteristics that are similar to endothermic. While the lecture refutes the claims made by the author by providing various counter arguments. The lecturer is of the opinion that even if they exhibit some characters which are analogous to the endothermic, they may be due to other causes which are discussed as following.
First of all, the author of the passage claims the existence of dinosaurs in the polar region is the proof for dinosaurs being endothermic. If they were not endothermic, there existence in such cold climatic conditions would not have been possible. This specific claim is challenged by the lecturer. He argues that the dinosaurs could have migrated to the warmer areas to survive the cold or could have hibernated which is common in many reptiles. Furthermore, the fossils found are warmer which puts serious doubt on dinosaurs being endothermic.
Secondly, the author argues that the leg position in dinosaurs -- like in many endothermic -- is below the body which helps in active endothermic activities like running. In the contrast, the lecturer refutes the argument by providing an alternative explanation that the position of leg in the dinosaurs is below the body in order to hold the massive weight of dinosaurs and not necessarily for active endothermic process like running.
Moreover, the author provides presence of Haversian canals in dinosaurs as an evidence of dinosaurs being endothermic. These Haversian canals are comprised of nerves and blood vessels that facilitate rapid growth which indicates that the animal is endothermic. On the other hand, the lectures disapproves of this argument by pointing out the presence of growth rings in the bones of dinosaurs. The presence of growth rings suggest that the growth is not rapid and is checked after certain time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...istics that are similar to endothermic. While the lecture refutes the claims made by ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... areas to survive the cold or could have hibernated which is common in many repti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, as to, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26086956522 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84492237069 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453416149068 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7616303463 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.933333333 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0245413346235 0.272083759551 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0109424295327 0.0996497079465 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279731678477 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0159162404469 0.162205337803 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159435585448 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.