The reading passage and the listening are both about the Rococo style. The article of the passage explains that the Rococo style was has lost their popularity and the style has been ridiculed and provides three reasons for support. However, in the lecture, the professor says that this critic is a one-sided view refutes all the reasons provided by the article.
First, the reading passage posits that in the late eighteenth century , the rococo styles ignored the working class and they only worked for the ruling class which shows arrogance and vanity. In contrast, the lecturer rebuts it by mentioning that roboco style also worked for the churches which represent every class of people.
Second,the article asserts that robocon art work was not based on serious subect matter and these art was more based shalow topic such as playing games in courtyard and the lover's picnic. On the other hand , the professor counters it by saying that Roboco style work was focused on feeling and imotion. She elaborated on this by bringing up the example of a painting of three people , she says that it was sensitive and sophisticate work which really shows the emotions.
Finally , the passage claims that roboco art was very gaudy and it was not a piece of insipiration at all.They mostly used unnecessary costly materials for their art. Article e also notes that the use of light and color was inappropriate. On the contrary, the professor believe that rococo art was a like a pioneer. Thye did experiment with the color and the lights to make the unique art nothing is wrong in that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... style was has lost their popularity and the style has been ridiculed and provide...
^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sits that in the late eighteenth century , the rococo styles ignored the working c...
^^
Line 5, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...present every class of people. Second,the article asserts that robocon art work w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s not based on serious subect matter and these art was more based shalow topic s...
^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d these art was more based shalow topic such as playing games in courtyard and t...
^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...and the lovers picnic. On the other hand , the professor counters it by saying tha...
^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he example of a painting of three people , she says that it was sensitive and soph...
^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ch really shows the emotions. Finally , the passage claims that roboco art was...
^^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Finally , the passage claims that roboco art was very gaudy and it was not a piec...
^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
... was not a piece of insipiration at all.They mostly used unnecessary costly material...
^^^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the contrary, the professor believe that rococo art was a like a pioneer. Thye di...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, really, second, so, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89591078067 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41782105604 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546468401487 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9051764554 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138006764239 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589914198445 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486774134457 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899939356774 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042783525536 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.