The reading passage and listening both about the writing style and work of poet Gertrude Stein. The author of the reading passage criticizes the work of Gertrude Stein and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor refutes each of the author's reasons. According to the professor, the author has a biased view of Stein's writing style.
First of all, the article states that Stein's writing was more about heavy and sounding words with less meaning. The author also mentions that Stein's poetry was more on visualization representation and its meaning and emotions were not very clear. On the other hand, the professor counters this reason by saying that many poets used to put more sounding words like Stein and it is a very important language, especially in poems. The lecturer also suggests that expressing meaning by putting heavy words or images makes the art different.
Secondly, the reading posits that Stein's writing style was very complex with less punctuation and commas and it was hard to understand. In contrast, the professor argues by stating that punctuation and comma are not that important and it not required. She elaborated on this by bringing up the point that Stein's work was very unique.
Finally, the author asserts that Stein's work is considered very influential because he used to gather with many historically important people. Moreover, the lecturer opposes this point by expressing her view that it was not a social connection but he really changes the literature and art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...nging up the point that Steins work was very unique. Finally, the author asserts that St...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14112903226 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57223617372 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520161290323 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.137792635 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0769230769 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310586774452 0.272083759551 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11660350912 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11858813265 0.0662205650399 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178294743344 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784696067392 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.