The listening and the reading are both about globalization. The author of the reading passage states that globalization has benefited the world in a myriad of the way and provides a three reasons for support. However, the lecture professor says that globalization is a heated topic in terms of whether it's advantageous or not and He refutes all of the reasons provided by the author.
First of all, the article posits that globalization fosters the economic growth of a country and he provides an example that like in a developing country, labor is a very cheap so developed nation can build industry there and produce goods at a low cost. On the other hand, the lecturer rebuts it by maintaining that if a developed nation will create the industry in another country because of cheap labor then there will be fewer jobs in their own country. The professor also elaborates on this by bringing up the example of Mexico and the united states' business relations.
Second, Reading asserts that globalization is affected our business in a good way by giving competition. For example, the industry will be producing high-quality products to compete with others. Moreover, Professor suggests that there is always a risk when you rely on another country in business. Professor provides an example, of the crisis in the USA , which influenced the whole of Europe.
Finally , The article claims that globalization also plays a role in protecting our environment. In contrast, the professor opposes this by saying that globalization infact encourages more pollution. He also adds that globalization creates cheap production and cheap production is directly proportional to environmental pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... its advantageous or not and He refutes all of the reasons provided by the author. Fi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 354, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...des an example, of the crisis in the USA , which influenced the whole of Europe. ...
^^
Line 9, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...fluenced the whole of Europe. Finally , The article claims that globalization a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, for example, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03276546484 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551470588235 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.392330144 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.846153846 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0147220521652 0.272083759551 5% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00459881006089 0.0996497079465 5% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0085778205189 0.0662205650399 13% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00837873588366 0.162205337803 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00867343781641 0.0443174109184 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.