Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific
points made in the reading about TED
Recently there has been a debate. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer puts forth the idea that Turtle Excluder Device(TED) application is very useful and successful in reducing sea turtle death for three specific reason. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point put that there are some serious flows in the authors claims. In fact, the professor believes that TED are a good invention but they are not perfect. She says that TED are not that effective as the author says.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states TED was specifically modeled to help sea turtle. He also adds that the mechanism of TED has a mechanical barrier in the middle of the net that prevents any animals which are bigger that ten centimeter. Some professionals in the same field, however, stand firm opposition to this claim. In the listening, for example, the professor states that turtles like longer head turtle are much smaller when compared to others are may get caught in it.
One group of scholars, represented by the writer, thinks that due to the Shrimp-Turtle Law it made sure fishermen use TED in their boats. He also highlights that there were specific organization which made sure that they are properly installed and maintained. Of course, though, not all experts in the field believe this is accurate. Again, the speaker specifically addresses this point when he states that it is not possible to monitor when they so far from the shore and even provides with an example that they remove the metal barrier from TED to reduce shrimp loss.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that America have tightly controls the import of shrimps. He asserts that all the ship must be certified user of TED-installed trawls. In the article it is also stated that absence of this certification will result in disapproval to sell their product. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with his claim by contending that the certification provided by the owners are fake Since different countries have different rules they tend to take advantage of that.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, for example, in fact, of course, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 12.0772626932 199% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 355.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96056338028 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65980238 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 145.348785872 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6690486408 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.588235294 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187492828693 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487464353576 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550156920747 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995256177772 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612492704601 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.