Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The article and the lecture are both discussing about the possibility of powered flight in pterosaurs, a particular kind of living things in the age of dinosaurs. The reading claims that pterosaurs could not be flying by flapping their wings and gives three reasons to support. The professor dismisses all reasons by saying that recent investigations reveals that these animals could be capable of powered flight.
First of all, the article posits that pterosaurs like modern reptiles might be cold-blooded, so it means they did not have ability to flight. The professor makes a counterargument by referring to the new evidence of a line of hair covering like feather in fossils which leads to the notion that these animals were warm-blooded. In this way, pterosaurs could have enough energy to fly.
Secondly, the reading asserts that weight of these animals have prevented them to be capable of powered flight. The professor disputes this point scientifically by saying that looking at the anatomy of pterosaurs depicts that this animal were not as heavy as considered in the past. She adds more explanation by saying that some bones of pterosaurs were hollow instead of solid, so their weight were enough low to be capable to fly.
Lastly, the reading makes an argument that these animals did not have strong limbs to jump, and initiate the flight. The professor refutes this point by saying that unlike modern birds, pterosaurs were walking on four limbs. She completes her argument by saying that with four limbs there were enough energy to run faster, and jump for flying.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ngs and gives three reasons to support. The professor dismisses all reasons by sayi...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'if', 'lastly', 'look', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'kind of', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235915492958 0.261695866417 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.183098591549 0.158904122519 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0739436619718 0.0723426182421 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0422535211268 0.0435111971325 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0281690140845 0.0277247811725 102% => OK
Prepositions: 0.165492957746 0.128828473217 128% => OK
Participles: 0.0528169014085 0.0370669169778 142% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62833861211 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0352112676056 0.0208969081088 168% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.112676056338 0.128158765124 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0140845070423 0.0158828679856 89% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00352112676056 0.0114777025283 31% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1586.0 1645.83664459 96% => OK
No of words: 262.0 271.125827815 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0534351145 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385496183206 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.274809160305 0.287516216867 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.137404580153 0.187439937562 73% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103053435115 0.113142543107 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62833861211 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511450381679 0.539623497131 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.9748890693 53.8517498576 91% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.8333333333 21.7502111507 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0037876614 49.3711431718 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.166666667 132.220823453 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 21.7502111507 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.878197800319 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 49.3142493639 50.5018328374 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.79166666667 1.90840788429 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272190527637 0.549887131256 49% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125827049184 0.142949733639 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0527234771386 0.0787303798458 67% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.609253821855 0.631733273073 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0827592700297 0.139662658121 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13728308584 0.266732575781 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865670618694 0.103435571967 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.409777525612 0.414875509568 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0511633722741 0.0530846634433 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209877303738 0.40443939384 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047520473654 0.0528353158467 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.